We have lost the ability to become great in a mythological sense. Society has pushed the envelope of every frontier such that advancement requires specialists who spend a lifetime for one breakthrough in one specific arena. The day of the common man’s ability to blaze his own trail is over, and we are left longing for not greatness but simpler times when we could have been great.
There are a few problems with this:
1) What we were given as fundamentals were the results of previous trail blazing. This means had we lived during simpler times, we would not have the advantage of our present hind-sight. If we are starting where they left off, how could we expect results then if we can’t expect them now? It’s interesting how everything new always feels like the first time.
2) Contrary to popular belief – mythological heroes, by definition, were uncommon. For every hero passed down to us from the ancients there are millions of normal people that lived, toiled, and died without notice. There is little difference today; even Mother Theresa is waiting for sainthood. This inconvenient truth helps polarize the ideal from any specific hero as being ideal does not necessarily yield rich, famous, or powerful by today’s standards.
3) Given the specificity of each heroic achievement, no accomplished individual can escape the critical eye of a meta-tagged, global culture. Does being a professional football player, Olympic athlete, humanitarian, soldier, or technology developer alone insure authentic heroism? The nature of the specificity takes away from the well-roundedness of character. In a mythological sense, we are only capable of being a one-pony-hero that dies on contact with anything outside of that one extraordinary skill.
4) The model for greatness, by definition, must be modeled by society. While one can be great to a few people, on a mythological scale it counts for nothing. There have been many people that lived and died unappreciated by their culture only to be understood and celebrated much later. This could start many conversations in itself, but for now I present it as a paradox of attempting to define oneself in such a way that requires definition by others. In total there are 3 choices of negotiation. A) Strategic position within what is selling. B) Do your thing larger than life and hope others jump on board. C) The hybrid – fake or compromise with what is selling until fame allows enough leverage to return to or reveal your true nature. Of note, option A only works if one willing to align with the sellable. Option B is the long shot and is used exclusively by true contenders of illusory greatness. Option C is a most despicable trade of constitution for notoriety wherein public definition has dominated self-definition.
My conclusions:
The pedagogical function of heroism is found in how to live one’s life. It has never been truly achieved by anyone, but is still useful for inspiration. This means “the ideal” is, by definition, what we think it is. The shortage crisis of heroes is a proportionate result of a mythological shortage. When the crowds roar with each person trying to be heard, bake a loaf of bread and sell them sandwiches.
Who knows; ya might get famous.









